Despapeliza

Legale GRC · Governance, risk and compliance

Governance, risk and compliance on autopilot.

Connect your systems, map your controls once and keep the evidence current continuously. Legale GRC turns compliance into a living operation, not a folder you rebuild for every audit.

Continuous control monitoringLive
MFA access on critical systemsUp to date
Quarterly access reviewUp to date
Backup policy · annual reviewExpires in 12 days
Staff security training94% complete
Evidence from critical suppliersUp to date
Illustrative example of the dashboardAudit ready · 96 %
1 platform

Controls, policies, risks, suppliers and evidence in one place, with traceability for every change.

Multi-standard

One control answers several standards at once: what proves ISO 27001 also serves SOC 2 or the local law.

Living evidence

Evidence is collected continuously from your systems, not the week before the audit.

Move time

Compliance is not lost all at once

It is lost little by little: a policy that needed reviewing, an access nobody recertified, a supplier whose certificate expired. Drag the line and watch the same five controls in both scenarios.

Since the last audit It has been 0 days
Today30 days90 days180 days1 year
Drag to move time forward
Without a GRC
100% audit ready
    Everything up to dateYou have just closed the audit.
    With Legale GRC
    100% audit ready
      Everything up to dateThe evidence collects itself.
      Why a GRC

      Three things that cost you dearly today

      The problem

      Evidence lives in shared folders, screenshots and emails. When the audit arrives, someone has to go hunting for it.

      With Legale GRC
      A single repository

      Every piece of evidence is dated, with its owner and its trail. You don't look for it: it's already there.

      The problem

      Each standard is handled separately, with its own spreadsheet and its own folder. The same control gets documented three times.

      With Legale GRC
      One control, several standards

      The inventory is mapped once and answers every standard you have to meet.

      The problem

      Customer security questionnaires slow down sales: each one is answered by hand and takes weeks.

      With Legale GRC
      Pre-approved answers

      They come from a validated library, and what is public the customer finds on their own in the trust center.

      One control, many standards

      Map once, comply many times

      The same access control answers ISO 27001, SOC 2, Law 21,719 and your customer's questionnaire. Tap a standard to see which controls cover it, or a control to see how many standards it answers.

      38 mappings across 8 controls. Tap a standard or a control.
      Control mapped to the standard
      Risk that moves

      From inherent risk to residual risk

      Logging a risk does not reduce it. What reduces it is the treatment plan, with an owner and a deadline. Switch the plans on and watch the matrix move.

      Impact Likelihood
        Six modules, one inventory

        Governance, risk and compliance on the same base

        Every module works on the same control inventory. There is no spreadsheet per standard and no folder per audit: there is one control, with its owner, its evidence and its history.

        Governance

        Controls and policies

        The control inventory with its owner, and versioned policies with staff acceptance on record.

        • Multi-standard mapping of each control
        • Change history with date and author
        • Policy acceptance per person
        Compliance

        Continuous monitoring and evidence

        Evidence is collected from the connected systems, not assembled by hand before each review.

        • Automatic, dated evidence
        • Alerts to the owner, not to a shared inbox
        • Permanent audit readiness
        Risk

        Risk management

        Risk register with an impact and likelihood matrix, treatment plans and calculated residual risk.

        • Inherent and residual matrix
        • A plan with an owner and a deadline
        • Progress tracking
        Third parties

        Supplier risk

        A register of suppliers assessed by criticality, with expirations under control and a file for each one.

        • Assessment by criticality
        • Alerts for documents about to expire
        • A complete file per supplier
        Trust

        Trust center

        A public page where the customer finds what they need without emailing you, and the confidential material stays under NDA.

        • Public certifications and policies
        • Reports and pentests under NDA
        • A record of who accessed what and when
        Sales

        Questionnaire assistant

        Security questionnaires stop blocking deals: the answers come from an approved library.

        • A library of validated answers
        • Review before sending
        • Traceability of what was answered
        What you have to comply with

        International standards and local ones

        An operator in Chile does not just meet ISO. It meets ISO, SOC 2, the personal data law, the cybersecurity framework and whatever its most demanding customer asks for. All on the same inventory.

        International

        The frameworks asked of you abroad

        • ISO/IEC 27001Information security
        • ISO/IEC 27701Data privacy
        • ISO/IEC 42001Artificial intelligence management
        • SOC 2Audited controls · AICPA
        • GDPRData protection · European Union
        Chile

        What is already a local obligation

        • Law 21,719Personal data protection
        • Law 21,663Cybersecurity framework · ANCI
        • Vitally Important OperatorReinforced obligations
        • Labor DirectorateElectronic employment records
        Trust center

        Stop answering the same email

        Every time a customer asks for your certifications, somebody puts together an email with attachments. The trust center publishes what is public and delivers the confidential material under NDA, with a record of every access.

        trust.yourcompany.com

        Trust center

        ISO 27001ISO 27701ISO 42001SOC 2ISSAANCI Chile
        Public Current certifications
        Public Security and privacy policies
        Public Subprocessors and suppliers
        Under NDA Audit report
        Under NDA Penetration tests

        We use it ourselves first

        Despapeliza runs its own public trust center. What we are proposing is not an idea: it is the tool we use to answer our own customers' audits.

        How it is implemented

        Connect, map, monitor, prove

        Step 01Connect

        The identity, infrastructure, HR and document systems the evidence comes from are integrated.

        Step 02Map

        The control inventory is defined once and cross-mapped to every standard you have to meet.

        Step 03Monitor

        Controls check themselves and, when something fails or is about to expire, the named owner is notified.

        Step 04Prove

        The evidence is already there: for the audit, for a tender or for a customer's questionnaire.

        Where the evidence comes from

        A GRC does not invent the evidence: it collects it

        The evidence already exists in your operation. It is in the contracts being signed, in the policies the team accepts and in the files being archived. The rest of the ecosystem hands it over on its own.

        Boardroom questions

        Does this replace the compliance officer?

        No. It takes off their plate the part that needs no judgement: gathering screenshots, chasing expirations and rebuilding folders. The decisions remain theirs.

        Is it useful if we are not certified yet?

        That is when it helps most. Starting with the control inventory mapped to the standard you are after shortens the preparation, because evidence builds up from day one instead of being gathered at the end.

        What about Law 21,719?

        It is mapped as one more standard in the inventory. The controls you already have for ISO 27701 cover much of its requirements, and the rest shows up as a visible gap with an assigned owner.

        How does the evidence get in if our systems are old?

        Through the API when the system exposes it, and through controlled upload when it does not. Whatever cannot be automated still gets a date, an owner and a reminder: it never goes back to being a loose screenshot in an email.

        And customer questionnaires?

        They are answered from an approved library and, in many cases, they never even arrive: the customer finds what they are looking for in the public trust center.

        Next step

        We show you with your own standards on the table

        Bring the standard you have to meet this year —an ISO, SOC 2, the data law or your most demanding customer's questionnaire— and we build the mapping in the same meeting.

        Which standard do you have to meet this year? Book a demo